Next, a panel of WLG members who sit on Welsh councils shared their experiences and their perspectives on the problems of austerity. Siobhan Corria (Cardiff), Gareth Phillips (Bridgend) and Jessica Powell (Torfaen) are all new councillors - as is Nick Davies (Swansea), who chaired the session - while Mark Whitcutt (Newport) is a more experienced councillor and, as of May, a cabinet member. They talked, variously, about the challenges of defending their communities, protecting jobs and services, avoiding outsourcing and overcoming democratic deficits. The ensuing discussion focussed particularly on how socialist councillors in different authorities could work together, learn from each others' experience and develop a common approach to the cuts.
After lunch, Cllr. Julia Magill, Cardiff cabinet member for education, was the guest speaker for a joint session with the Socialist Educational Association. Julia answered questions on a number of issues - notably, the balance between enabling parental choice and upholding catchment areas to support neighbourhood schools.
Finally, we dealt with AGM business, taking officers' reports and carrying resolutions to increase membership subs; ensure greater engagement with the Labour Representation Committee; oppose moves to outsource local services, particularly in Cardiff; and adopt a statement of WLG 'principles and priorities' (see attached for the final text of all resolutions). The incoming steering committee is: Nick Davies (chair); Fran Griffiths & Maggie Simpson (vice chair - job-share); Darren Williams (secretary); Len Arthur (asst. secretary); David Ll. Davies (treasurer); Bob Clay; Uta Clay; Siobhan Corria; Bob Davies; Annabelle Harle; John Ivor Lewis; Jessica Powell; & Mark Turner. The auditors are Bill Harle & David Meurig Thomas.
For those who weren't able to attend Saturday's meeting, please renew your membership a.s.a.p. (unless you already have a standing order) by sending a cheque for £10/£5 to me at 33 Lansdowne Road, Cardiff CF5 1PQ - or email me about setting up a standing order.
RESOLUTIONS CARRIED AT THE WELSH LABOUR
GRASSROOTS 2012 AGM
RESOLUTION
1
This AGM:
·
notes
that, although the WLG constitution and rules states that membership fees ‘will be reviewed at each Annual General Meeting’, the
annual rates of £5 (waged) and £3 (unwaged/low-waged) have remained unchanged
since WLG was formally launched in 2004;
·
recognises that the cost of running a growing, all-Wales
organisation, along with the cumulative effects of inflation over the last
eight years, mean that these rates now provide insufficient income to guarantee
the financial stability of the group.
This AGM therefore agrees:
·
that annual membership rates should be increased, with immediate
effect, to £10 (waged) and £5 (unwaged/low-waged); and
·
that all WLG members should regard payment of membership fees as a
basic political responsibility and that those who persistently fail to keep up
their payments will be regarded as having lapsed.
RESOLUTION 2
This
WLG AGM:
1) recognises the Labour Representation Committee as a key body in the LP where socialists organise and an important site in the struggle for working class solidarity across Britain;
2) notes that WLG is an affiliate of the LRC with the right to send delegates to its AGM and to submit resolutions and nominations to its national committee and to the editorial board of its journal, Labour Briefing;
3) resolves to co-ordinate the timing of future WLG AGMs so as to facilitate the submission of resolutions and nominations to the LRC AGM.
1) recognises the Labour Representation Committee as a key body in the LP where socialists organise and an important site in the struggle for working class solidarity across Britain;
2) notes that WLG is an affiliate of the LRC with the right to send delegates to its AGM and to submit resolutions and nominations to its national committee and to the editorial board of its journal, Labour Briefing;
3) resolves to co-ordinate the timing of future WLG AGMs so as to facilitate the submission of resolutions and nominations to the LRC AGM.
RESOLUTION 3
This AGM:
·
notes, with grave concern, the recent Cardiff Council cabinet paper
considering new ways of providing council services, which identified
outsourcing to the private sector as an option, despite the lack of any reference
to outsourcing in the Cardiff Labour manifesto or the preceding policy process;
·
believes that the very inclusion of this as an option risks
alienating staff, undermining the critical relationship with trade
unions and diminishing the prospects of achieving the required service
improvements and efficiencies;
·
therefore agrees that privatisation must be ruled out, in favour
of applying the Welsh Government policy of pursuing collaboration between authorities,
at regional and national level, as set out in the Local Government Minister’s
‘Collaborative Footprint’ document, to achieve critical mass within the public
sector;
·
calls on WLG members who sit on Cardiff Council to work with trade
unions and party activists to prevent the adoption of outsourcing, and on WLG
members on other Welsh councils to take a similarly robust position in response
to any privatisation proposals that may arise elsewhere;
·
also calls on Welsh Labour councillors to oppose all compulsory
redundancies.
RESOLUTION 4
This AGM:
·
values the breadth and diversity of opinion and
experience within WLG but also recognises the need for a common understanding
of our political orientation and objectives as an organisation;
·
therefore agrees to adopt the statement of
Principles and Priorities that has been circulated and discussed in recent
months, as now amended, as a restatement of the basic political line that we
have developed over the course of previous AGMs and an attempt to guide our
work over the longer term (while recognising that many of the details may be
overtaken by events).
WELSH
LABOUR GRASSROOTS PRINCIPLES & PRIORITIES
We
are socialists in the Labour Party
§ We do not accept
that there is anything ‘natural’ or ‘inevitable’ about the injustice,
insecurity and exploitation that characterise free-market capitalism.
§ We believe in the
possibility of an alternative way of organising society that is more equal,
democratic and sustainable, where the economy is driven by need, not profit,
and people have control over own lives.
§ While we are ready
to build alliances with socialists and progressives in other parties, and in no
party, we are committed to working within Labour, as the only party potentially
capable of representing the interests of ordinary people at the level of
(British) government.
Labour
government – at all levels – should be about transformation, not management
§ Winning elections
is only ever a means to an end, not an end in itself.
§ Among other
things, transformation should be about ensuring that our representatives
reflect all sections of society and that women and ethnic minorities are not
sidelined.
§ The worst Labour
government is better than the best Tory government – but a Labour government
that simply wants its turn to operate the status quo is hardly worth having.
§ Our responsibility
is to do more than get Labour candidates elected and to defend their actions
afterwards – we should scrutinise their work, hold them to account and actively
lobby for the policies we think they should be carry out, as well as for
greater openness and engagement with citizens.
§ As an organised
left, we have to challenge those in Labour who subordinate social and political
change to electoral expediency, or who deny the need for change altogether.
Austerity
isn’t working anywhere
§ Cuts are a
political choice, not an economic necessity.
§ Political and
economic elites are applying the ‘shock doctrine’ – using the crisis to
restructure their economies and societies in the interests of the rich.
§ The injustice of
the cuts is exacerbated by the fact that they are falling disproportionately on
women, Black people and the disabled.
§ Official Labour
policy can be characterised as ‘austerity lite’ and represents an inadequate
response to Con-Dem policies.
§ Credible
alternative policies have been persuasively set out by trade unions, by Compass,
by Mark Drakeford and others; we should do more to publicise and argue for
these alternatives and to contribute our own ideas.
§ The anti-cuts
movement needs a principled but constructive voice, which we could help to
provide.
Our
allegiance is to working people, the poor and the oppressed everywhere
§ We stand for international solidarity, not putting
Britain (or Wales) first – although our efforts are centred in Wales, where our
political roots lie.
§ We have a duty to
defend those scapegoated by the right for the economic crisis – benefit
claimants, economic migrants, asylum seekers – as well as those threatened by
reactionary policies because of their gender, ethnicity, nationality, faith,
sexuality or disability.
§ We should promote
– and, where possible, organise – practical solidarity with people in Greece
and elsewhere, who have been hardest hit by austerity.
§ We must continue
to oppose imperialist military, economic and diplomatic policies – including
the possibility of further wars in the Middle East – and support climate
justice and debt cancellation.
Thanks
to democratic devolution, and our political traditions, Wales has something
worth defending
§ Welsh Labour’s
record of strengthening public services and advancing equality is an example to
promote at a British level.
§ We have to defend Welsh
Labour’s achievements from austerity and from ‘innovations’ that risk undoing
the good that has been done.
We’ll
never have socialism without democracy
§ Labour hasn’t
broken the anti-democratic habits it acquired over the past two decades.
§ Despite the warm
words about accountability from the present leadership, there has been
virtually no appreciable change in the ‘Partnership in Power’ regime; to this
end, we defend party democracy, open policy debate and accountability at all
levels.
§ We still have
control-freakery over candidate selections – along with inadequate measures to
ensure the selection of women and ethnic minority candidates – and
accountability has been further weakened by the abolition of county parties.
§ Trade unions are
potentially an important part of the alliance to secure greater democracy – but
they can also be part of the problem, with most of them needing democratic
reform too.
No comments:
Post a Comment